The version without Denuvo ALWAYS runs faster, with ***incredibly*** faster load-ups upon starting the games up, faster load times throughout, smoother gameplay, and far less crashes. I've personally been in numerous (over a dozen to be sure) situations where I've played the same exact game on PC with and without Denuvo. It's nice to see some people here who aren't completely clueless and have actually read-up on the subject. Now, the amount it slows down is only a few frames, but why have an inferior product for NO reason? This is spot-on.

Evidence suggests denuvo slows down games as well, not just with it's implementation as you claim.

Now, the amount it slows down is only a few frames, but why have an inferior product for NO reason? Remember Darkspore? No, no one does, because it's a victim of just what I mentioned (from another 3rd party DRM). If companies catch up to my first point, it won't be long. Online checks every x amount of days, meaning once the servers shut down, the game you've just purchased is rendered unplayable. Piracy has been proven not to harm game sales, so spending 100k in the first place for something meaningless is beyond stupid. Anyone that actually looks into stuff like this knows how dumb it is. I don't even know where to start listing everything that's wrong with that. Originally posted by koimeiji:There's nothing wrong with it from the consumer standpoint.ĭenuvo games are server-bound rentals with built-in off switches that you have to ask permission to play after you pay for them.

Denuvo just cause 3